Saturday, 31 December 2011

Lokayukta Cancels Kerala University Appointments

') .css({ 'float' : 'left', 'width' : slideWidth }); $('#slideInner').css('width', slideWidth * numberOfSlides); $('#slideshow') .prepend('

'); manageControls(currentPosition); $('.control') .bind('click', function(){ currentPosition = ($(this).attr('id')=='rightControl') ? currentPosition+1 : currentPosition-1; manageControls(currentPosition); $('#slideInner').animate({ 'marginLeft' : slideWidth*(-currentPosition) }); }); function manageControls(position) { if(position==0) { $('#leftControl').hide() document.getElementById("p2").style.display = "block"; document.getElementById("p3").style.display = "block"; $('#rightControl').show() } else if(position==numberOfSlides-2 ) { $('#leftControl').show() document.getElementById("p3").style.display = "block"; $('#rightControl').show() } else if(position==numberOfSlides-1 ) { $('#leftControl').show() document.getElementById("p2").style.display = "block"; $('#rightControl').hide() } } });

Thiruvananthapuram: In a shocker to the previous Left government, the Kerala Lokayukta Thursday asked the Kerala University to cancel all the appointments made to the assistant grade posts in 2008 as the process then was not transparent.

Issuing the directive, Upa Lokayukta Justice G. Sashidharan said action should be taken against the then vice chancellor M.K. Ramachandran Nair, pro vice chancellor V. Jayaprakash and four University Syndicate members.

During the Left government led by V.S. Achuthanandan of the Communist Party of India-Marxist, the Congress had raised this issue as a major corruption case and had on numerous occasions disrupted the proceedings of the state assembly.

The case was unearthed by Sujith S. Kurup, the then Kerala University Senate member and Congress student leader, who filed a case with the Upa Lokayukta that large-scale corruption took place in the university appointing friends and relatives of Left supporters.

Even though the selection test for appointments was conducted during the Congress-led government's tenure in 2006, the list of those who had passed the examination was prepared during tne Achuthanadan government's time and appointments were made.

At that time, 160 candidates were posted and the Congress opposition alleged that 60 of them were close to the Left political leaders.

In Thursday's directive, the Lokayukta has asked the Kerala University to cancel the appointments made from the list and conduct a fresh entrance examination.

The Upa Lokayukta in 2008 had asked the officials of the Kerala University to produce the nearly 40,000 answer sheets of the entrance examination but that has not been done so far.

Soon after the controversy broke out in 2008, the varsity cut a sorry figure after its two-member team was sent to a high-security printing press in Uttar Pradesh to find out if the answer sheets were with them after evaluation was conducted.

But they returned empty handed with the news that the answer sheets had already been returned to the university.

Reacting to the latest development, Kurup said that finally the truth has triumphed and it is a blow to the previous Left government which did nothing to unravel the major scam.

"The unfortunate part is that since the entire list stands cancelled, even those who managed to get this job purely on merit stand affected," he added.

In 2008 when the Lokayukta first asked for cancellation of the list, the aggrieved people approached the Kerala High Court and demanded to stay the directive, but the court constituted a committee to go through the case.

The committee also concluded that the appointments were not made in a transparent manner. The court then asked the Lokayukta to go into the case once again.

However, the then vice chancellor Nair said he was certain that the list and the appointments were done in a clean way.

"What has come from the Lokayukta is a directive and we are now waiting to hear from the high court," he said.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/si-career/~3/OVDAFmXfkjs/Lokayukta_Cancels_Kerala_University_Appointments-nid-101919.html

norad santa epic beard man new york jets nfl standings broncos broncos giants vs jets

2012 NBA predictions: Bryant, Lakers in for two fights; Where is Dwight going?

Sporting News looks at five story lines to watch in the NBA in 2012:

1. The battle for L.A.

The trade that sent Chris Paul to the Clippers had a special place in the craw of Lakers fans. For one thing, before the veto of commissioner David Stern, Paul was very nearly a Laker. Additionally, he was part of the Lakers? plan for the future that also included acquiring Orlando center Dwight Howard. The addition of Paul?with Chauncey Billups and Caron Butler?to the Blake Griffin Show means that the Clippers now have at least as much, if not more, talent than the Lakers. The Staples Center co-tenants will battle not only for bragging rights in town, but for the Pacific Division crown.

PREDICTION: The Lakers figure to right themselves once they work Andrew Bynum back into the lineup, but once the Clippers develop chemistry, they have the more talented roster. Look for the Clips to nose out the Lakers in the Pacific Division.

CBA reality series

Part I: Drafting a star gets you seven years | Part II: 'Bird Rights' are a myth | Part III: The luxury tax could pull apart the Heat | Part IV: Superstar trades won't become the norm

2. What will Dwight do?

We have seen this scenario before: Star player in a small market playing for a good-but-not-great team, star player wants out, free agency is coming up and a long, drawn-out saga over the player?s future ensues. Last year, it took Denver until the week of the trade deadline to finally make a move on Carmelo Anthony, and this year, Orlando might do the same (the trade deadline is March 15) with Howard. The options are narrow, as Howard has indicated he prefers the Nets or the Lakers, and both teams have limited or flawed assets. The Magic, for their part, have said they are not seeking trades for Howard?at least not yet. In the backdrop is this uncomfortable fact: The Magic will be hosting the All-Star Game in February, and the entire weekend could be overshadowed by Howard?s status.

PREDICTION: The Magic will eventually have to read the writing on the wall and accept the fact that they can either get some assets for Howard or lose him for nothing. Orlando will take its time, but the bet here is that Howard winds up in New Jersey.

3. The Heat?s Big Three in Year 2

Miami did not come up with the championship that many expected after it brought in LeBron James and Chris Bosh to team with Dwyane Wade. But the Heat did earn a spot in The Finals, blowing away Philadelphia, Boston and Chicago in last year?s playoffs before running into the Dallas buzzsaw. It is motivation from that Finals loss?and the addition of veteran wing defender Shane Battier?that should have the Heat primed to take home this year?s title.

PREDICTION: That Finals loss is a pretty significant motivating factor for the Heat this year. Throw in the addition of veteran wing defender Shane Battier and the play of rookie point guard Norris Cole, and the Heat are primed to take home this year?s title.

4. The last stands

With Kobe Bryant playing through a wrist injury and Pau Gasol aging, the Lakers had hoped that the Paul trade would infuse the roster with a star player in his prime. Instead, the Lakers are looking to squeeze one more title run out of this group. They?re hardly alone. The aging defending-champion Mavericks pared their roster in order to prepare for rebuilding next year, the Spurs are trying to infuse some youth on the fly as Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili decline, and after showing their age in the postseason, the Celtics look especially old this year. These teams account for 11 of the last 13 championships, but there might not be much left in any of their tanks.

PREDICTION: Time to close the book on all four of these teams. If either the Mavs or Lakers can nab Howard, they?ll stay in the championship picture. But not this year.

5. The next steps

If there is a vacuum forming as the top teams in the league age, then that vacuum will be filled by two non-Miami teams: The Bulls and the Thunder. Not that both teams don?t have issues to work out. In order to compete for a title, the Bulls need to locate the Carlos Boozer they thought they were signing when they gave him a five-year, $80 million deal in the summer of 2010, and they need new shooting guard Richard Hamilton to play like it is 2006 (or at least, 2009). That will take pressure off point guard Derrick Rose, who needs to get better at figuring out when to use his teammates and when to be a scorer himself?he forced the action too much in the playoffs last year.

?SI.com: Always thinking of MJ, Rose is after one thing: championship trophy

The same can be said for Thunder point guard Russell Westbrook, who likely holds the key to his team?s title hopes. We?ve already seen that Westbrook has some difficulty dealing with teammates, and he needs to be a better leader, on and off the floor.

PREDICTION: Bulls continue to improve, but not quite enough to get past Miami. Oklahoma City, meanwhile, punches its ticket to the Finals. And loses to Miami.

Source: http://aol.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2011-12-30/2012-nba-predictions-chris-paul-clippers-kobe-lakers-derrick-rose-dwight-howard

daniel day lewis patti stanger pasadena pasadena famu famu martina mcbride

South Carolina Looms Large (Taegan Goddard's Political Wire)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/180647671?client_source=feed&format=rss

big east jesse james pearl harbor day discovery channel jersey shore season 5 lea michele michael buble

Friday, 30 December 2011

'Homeless By Choice' College Kid on the Art of Bourgeois Homelessness [Homelessness]

'Homeless By Choice' College Kid on the Art of Bourgeois HomelessnessA Cardozo student spent a year living on the street because "I wasn't satisfied, my life just felt meaningless because I didn't have really any challenges." Noting that Neaderthals probably didn't experience boredom, he quit paying for his apartment and started sleeping on the street.

After moving back indoors for the winter months, "David" told his tale to the Yeshiva University Observer. (He's keeping his identity secret until he gets a job.) The interview, entitled "Homeless By Choice," reads like a primer on maintaining an outwardly bourgeois lifestyle while sleeping on the street. The key was maintaining a membership and four lockers at the New York Health and Racquet Club, he says:

So I have one locker for running clothes and laundry, one for dress shirts, one for dress pants and one for miscellaneous things. And also each locker has a spot for shoes at the top so that's really good.

I had to really reduce the amount of stuff that I had. I had to get rid of everything that's nonessential. I only have, like, five dress shirts, five dress pants, some running clothes that are necessary and then obviously sweatshirts and stuff. Other than clothes I don't really have a lot of stuff, just stuff for shaving and brushing my teeth and books. I have a school locker too, so that helps.

I also have access to my school. Its open until midnight and then opens again at 8 a.m. so I nap there a lot. There's this one room in the library that has couches and I nap there during the day when I have breaks in between classes. At night I try and stay in there as late as possible so I can get the maximum amount of warmth. So I'll leave there at midnight and go find a spot and then NY Health and Racquet club opens at six. So I really only have six hours outside, so its not unbearable.

Asked whether he recommends homelessness for others, David replied in the negative, but did noted that he could do a bang-up job as a "homelessness consultant":

One thing that I definitely see doing being a "homelessness consultant." There are so many people that are getting foreclosed on and have nowhere to go. The fact of the matter is, I would say that maybe 100 dollars a month invest in gym and lockers and equipment, it can be done. I wouldn't recommend it for someone it wasn't a necessity for. But for someone going through hard times, it can be done? Just because you sleep outside for six hours a night doesn't mean that for the rest of the day you can't be shaved showered, in clothes, acting normal and doing normal things.

So, there you have it. The secret to successful homelessness: Having enough discretionary income to afford a gym membership, and maybe college tuition at a school where the library stays open late. Although at that point, you could maybe just move into a flophouse? Depending on the weather, where your tuition is coming from, and how comfortable you find park benches. Personally, I keep a spare memory foam mattress pad in my hobo bindle. Really improves the comfort of rusted-out sidewalk grates. [YU Observer, sleeping man of unknown housing status via Flickr]

Source: http://gawker.com/5871730/homeless-by-choice-college-kid-on-the-art-of-bourgeois-homelessness

jenelle evans miami hurricanes vlad the impaler steven tyler michael lohan fiddler on the roof rally squirrel

WHERE THEY STAND: The 7 GOP candidates on 13 issues|With updated GRAPHIC

WHERE THEY STAND: The 7 GOP candidates on 13 issues
With updated GRAPHIC

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Here's where the 2012 Republican presidential candidates stand on a selection of issues.

They are Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Utah Gov. John Huntsman, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum.

ABORTION:

Bachmann: Backed efforts to declare the unborn "persons" under the Constitution, the most direct challenge to the Supreme Court's affirmation of abortion rights. Signed pledge to advance only anti-abortion appointees for relevant administration jobs, cut off federal dollars for clinics that perform or finance abortions, and support a ban on abortions after the fetus reaches a certain stage in development. Introduced bill to require pregnant women to see and hear the fetal heartbeat before having an abortion. Promoted other anti-abortion bills, including some that contained exceptions for rape, incest or the life of a mother. Sought to put abortion restrictions into Minnesota's constitution while in state Legislature.

Gingrich: Signed anti-abortion pledge. "Principles to protect life" platform calls for conservative judges and no subsidies for abortion but not for constitutional abortion ban.

Huntsman: Signed abortion restrictions into law as governor, favors constitutional abortion ban.

Paul: Says federal government should have no authority either to legalize or ban abortion. Yet signed pledge to advance only anti-abortion appointees for relevant administration jobs, cut off federal dollars for clinics that perform or finance abortions, and support a ban on abortions after the fetus reaches a certain stage in development.

Perry: Now supports constitutional abortion ban after saying states should decide their own laws on such issues. Backed Texas law that attempts to discourage abortions by making doctors describe the fetus' size limbs and organs to the woman, and make available an image of the fetus and the sound of its heartbeat to her, before she can have the procedure.

Romney: Opposes abortion rights. Previously supported them. Says state law should guide abortion rights, and Roe v. Wade should be reversed by a future Supreme Court. But says Roe vs. Wade is law of the land until that happens and should not be challenged by federal legislation seeking to overturn abortion rights affirmed by that court decision. Would not sign pledge to advance only anti-abortion appointees for relevant administration jobs, cut off federal dollars for clinics that perform or finance abortions, and support a ban on abortions after the fetus reaches a certain stage in development. "So I would live within the law, within the Constitution as I understand it, without creating a constitutional crisis. But I do believe Roe v. Wade should be reversed to allow states to make that decision."

Santorum: Favors constitutional abortion ban and opposes abortion even in cases of rape because "I would absolutely stand and say that one violence is enough." Previously supported right to abortion in cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother.

DEBT:

Bachmann: Opposed the agreement worked out by Congress and the White House to raise the debt ceiling and avoid a default. Said U.S. could have paid only the interest on debt while working out a plan to cut spending more deeply.

Gingrich: As House speaker in mid-1990s, engineered passage of a seven-year balanced-budget plan. It was vetoed by President Bill Clinton but helped form a bipartisan balanced budget two years later. Supports constitutional balanced budget amendment. Said that without a balanced budget, the U.S. had no choice but to raise its debt limit in the deal that avoided a default.

Huntsman: Only candidate to endorse the deal that averted a default on U.S. debt payments, "a positive step toward cutting our nation's crippling debt."

Paul: Would eviscerate federal government, slashing nearly half its spending, shut five Cabinet-level agencies, end spending on existing conflicts and on foreign aid.

Perry: Was non-committal on the deal that avoided default and raised debt ceiling. Proposes to cap federal spending at 18 percent of gross domestic product, down from about 25 percent today, but no specifics on major spending cuts other than raising retirement age for Social Security and Medicare benefits for future retirees. Favors constitutional balanced-budget amendment. "No more bailouts." Freeze size and salaries of federal civilian work force until budget is balanced. Press Congress to cut lawmakers' and president's pay by half.

Romney: Defended 2008 bailout of financial institutions as a necessary step to avoid the system's collapse, criticized the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler and said any such aid should not single out specific companies. Cap federal spending at 20 percent of gross domestic product, down from today's recession-swollen 25 percent. Stayed silent on the debt-ceiling deal during its negotiation, only announcing his opposition to the final agreement shortly before lawmakers cast their votes. Instead, endorsed GOP "cut, cap and balance" bill that had no chance of enactment. Favors constitutional balanced budget amendment. Proposes 10 percent cut in federal workforce, elimination of $1.6 billion in Amtrak subsidies and cuts of $600 million in support for the public arts and broadcasting.

Santorum: Opposed the financial-industry bailout and stimulus programs of the Bush and Obama administrations. Supports constitutional balanced budget amendment.

ECONOMY:

Bachmann: Voted for $192 billion in stimulus spending in July 2009; voted against two earlier stimulus packages totaling nearly $900 billion and against housing aid and auto-industry aid. Opposed extension of jobless benefits. "Government overregulation is the single biggest jobs killer." Repeal the financial-industry regulations enacted in response to the subprime housing crisis.

Gingrich: Repeal the 2010 financial industry and consumer protection regulations that followed the Wall Street meltdown, and repeal the 2002 regulations enacted in response to the Enron and other corporate and accounting scandals. Restrict the Fed's power to set interest rates artificially low. Make work training a condition of unemployment insurance and have states run it.

Huntsman: End corporate subsidies, cut regulations, lower taxes, spur jobs through energy development, seek repeal of President Barack Obama's health care law. Break up megabanks as a hedge against future bailouts of the industry.

Paul: Return to the gold standard, eliminate the Federal Reserve, let gold and silver be used as legal tender, eliminate most federal regulations.

Perry: Spur economy by repealing rafts of regulations, Obama's health care law and the law (Dodd-Frank) toughening financial-industry regulations after the meltdown in that sector. Create jobs in energy sector by removing obstacles to drilling and production. Cut corporate taxes.

Romney: Lower taxes, less regulation, balanced budget, more trade deals to spur growth. Replace jobless benefits with unemployment savings accounts. Proposes repeal of the law (Dodd-Frank) toughening financial-industry regulations after the meltdown in that sector. Proposes changing, but not repealing, the (Sarbanes-Oxley) law tightening accounting regulations in response to corporate scandals, to ease the accountability burden on smaller businesses. "We don't want to tell the world that Republicans are against all regulation. No, regulation is necessary to make a free market work. But it has to be updated and modern."

Santorum: Spur jobs by eliminating corporate taxes for manufacturers, drill for more oil and gas, and slash regulations. "Repeal every regulation the Obama administration has put in place that's over $100 million. Repeal them all. You may have to replace a few, but let's repeal them all because they are all antagonistic to businesses, particularly in the manufacturing sector."

EDUCATION:

Bachmann: Wants to abolish Education Department, which she calls unconstitutional. Says federal government doesn't have a role in education; jurisdiction is with state and local governments. Tried to pull Minnesota out of No Child Left Behind law.

Gingrich: "Dramatically shrink the federal Department of Education, get rid of virtually all of its regulations." But supported Obama administration's $4 billion Race to the Top grant competition for states, which encourages compliance with national education standards, because it also promotes charter schools.

Huntsman: "No Child Left Behind hasn't worked for this country. It ought to be done away with." Favors more school choice.

Paul: Abolish the Education Department and end the federal role in education.

Perry: Turned down federal education aid to Texas worth up to $700 million because he saw it as imposing national standards on Texas schools. Says No Child Left Behind law gave Washington too much power to interfere with local government.

Romney: Supported the federal accountability standards of No Child Left Behind law. In 2007, said he was wrong earlier in his career when he wanted the Education Department shut because he came to see the value of the federal government in "holding down the interests of the teachers' unions" and putting kids and parents first.

Santorum: Voted for No Child Left Behind law. Wants "significantly" smaller Education Department but not its elimination. Criticized early childhood education programs as an attempt by government to "indoctrinate your children."

ENERGY:

Bachmann: Reduce regulatory impediments to drilling. Voted to open the outer continental shelf to oil drilling. Voted against tax breaks for renewable energy and conservation.

Gingrich: Let oil and natural gas industries drill offshore reserves now blocked from development, end restrictions on Western oil shale development. In Alaska alone, "We could liberate an area the size of Texas for minerals and other development."

Huntsman: Used tax credits to promote clean energy in Utah but says he has learned that "subsidies don't work and that we can no longer afford them." Favors phasing out all energy subsidies and cutting regulatory obstacles to drilling and production. Says nation's fuel distribution network should be subject to Federal Trade Commission and Senate Judiciary Committee review because it gives oil an unfair advantage over natural gas. "We need to break oil's monopoly as a transportation fuel, and create a truly level playing field for competing fuels."

Paul: Remove restrictions on drilling, coal and nuclear power, eliminate gasoline tax, provide tax credits for alternative fuel technology.

Perry: Proposes authorizing more development on federal lands and slashing regulations to spur drilling in restricted areas and open off-limits waters and lands to production, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the Southern Atlantic and Alaskan outer continental shelves. Opposes federal restrictions on natural gas production, including environmentally risky fracturing techniques and horizontal drilling.

Romney: Accelerate drilling permits in areas where exploration has already been approved for developers with good safety records. Supports drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific outer continental shelves, Western lands, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and offshore Alaska; and supports exploitation of shale oil deposits. Reduce obstacles to coal, natural gas and nuclear energy development. Says green power has yet to become viable.

Santorum: Favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and scaling back "oppressive regulation" hindering drilling elsewhere.

ENVIRONMENT:

Bachmann: Open federal lands to economic activity by "repealing radical environmental laws that kill access to natural resources." Voted to bar Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases. Opposes cap and trade.

Gingrich: Convert EPA into an "environmental solutions agency" devoted to scientific research and "more energy, more jobs and a better environment simultaneously." Supported tougher environmental regulation early in congressional career.

Huntsman: End the EPA's "regulatory reign of terror." Acknowledges the scientific evidence that humans contribute to global warming. As governor, supported regional cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and urged Congress to cap them. "I will break down barriers to the continued, safe use of fracking," an environmentally risky technique for extracting natural gas.

Paul: In 2008, said "human activity probably does play a role" in global warming and part of the solution should be to stop subsidizing the oil industry and let prices rise until the free market turns to alternate energy sources. Now calls the science on manmade global warming a "hoax." Says emission standards should be set by states or regions, not Washington.

Perry: Manmade global warming is a "scientific theory that has not been proven and from my perspective is more and more being put into question." Proposes repeal of EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases and elimination of all EPA programs to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. Opposes restrictions on coal industry under the Clean Air and Clean Water acts.

Says environmental regulation and conservation are best achieved at state level and EPA should be converted to a "research and advisory" agency with no enforcement powers except when states ask for federal arbitration of regional disputes. As governor, cut money for clean air programs, cut the budget for Texas' environmental watchdog by a third and sued EPA to avoid enforcing clean air laws. Signed law that requires Texas to consider the effect of new regulations on the economy before passing them. Supports environmentally risky techniques for extracting natural gas.

Romney: Spending a fortune to cut the emissions linked to global warming "is not the right course for us." Has acknowledged the scientific consensus that humans contribute to global warming: "I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that." But now says: "My view is that we don't know what's causing climate change on this planet." Proposes to remove carbon dioxide from list of pollutants controlled by Clean Air Act, and amend clean water and air laws to ensure the cost of complying with regulations is balanced against environmental benefit. Says cap and trade would "rocket energy prices."

Santorum: The science establishing human activity as a likely contributor to global warming is "patently absurd" and "junk science."

GAY MARRIAGE:

Bachmann: Supports constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Says federal law trumps state law on the issue but she "would not be going into the states to overturn their state law."

Gingrich: If the Defense of Marriage Act fails, "you have no choice except a constitutional amendment" to ban gay marriage. Under the act, the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriage and no state is forced to recognize a same-sex marriage validated by another state.

Huntsman: Supports same-sex civil unions, with many of the rights of marriage, and says states should decide their own policies.

Paul: Says decisions on legalizing or prohibiting should be left to states. Supports federal law allowing one state to refuse to recognize the same-sex marriages of another state.

Perry: Now supports constitutional ban on gay marriage after saying states should choose their own courses.

Romney: Favors constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, says policy should be set federally, not by states. "Marriage is not an activity that goes on within the walls of a state."

Santorum: Supports constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, not leaving decision to states. "We can't have 50 marriage laws." ''Abraham Lincoln said the states do not have the right to do wrong. I respect the 10th Amendment, but we are a nation that has values. We are a nation that was built on a moral enterprise, and states don't have the right to tramp over those because of the 10th Amendment."

HEALTH CARE:

Bachmann: Promises to seek repeal of Obama's health care law. Favors limits on medical lawsuits as a way to control health care costs. Voted against expanding Children's Health Insurance Program and against regulating tobacco as a drug.

Gingrich: Repeal Obama's health care law if Republicans win congressional majorities. Prohibit insurers from cancelling or charging discriminatory rate increases to those who become sick while insured, which is an element of Obama's law. Offer the choice of a "generous" tax credit to help people buy health insurance or the ability to deduct part of the cost from taxes, another feature similar to the existing law. Limit medical lawsuits to restrain health care costs and let people in one state buy policies in another. "Block-grant Medicaid and send it back to the states." Previously supported proposals that people be required to carry health insurance.

Huntsman: "Let the states experiment." Says government should "absolutely not" require anyone to have health insurance, although he once said a mandate would be necessary for any comprehensive change to succeed. Open to restricting Medicare benefits for the wealthy. Seek repeal of Obama's health care law.

Paul: Opposes compulsory insurance and all government subsidies for health coverage. Favors letting people deduct full cost of their health coverage and care from taxes. Says doctors should then feel an obligation to treat the needy for free.

Perry: Repeal Obama health care law. Raise eligibility age for Medicare benefits, limit benefits for the wealthy and give people the choice of receiving federal aid to help purchase their own insurance instead of getting the direct benefits of the current system. Proposes turning Medicaid over to the states with no-strings federal support. Texas has the highest percentage of uninsured people in the nation. Signed a law that would allow Texas ? subject to federal approval ? to band together with other states and take over the role of providing health care coverage for the elderly, the poor and the disabled.

Romney: Promises to work for the repeal of the federal health care law modeled largely after his universal health care achievement in Massachusetts because he says states, not Washington, should drive policy on the uninsured. Proposes to guarantee that people who are "continuously covered" for a certain period be protected against losing insurance if they get sick, leave their job and need another policy.

Would expand individual tax-advantaged medical savings accounts and let the savings be used for insurance premiums as well as personal medical costs. Would let insurance be sold across state lines to expand options, and restrict malpractice awards to restrain health care costs. Introduce "generous" but undetermined subsidies to help future retirees buy private insurance instead of going on traditional Medicare.

No federal requirement for people to have health insurance. His Massachusetts plan requires people to have coverage, penalizes those who don't, and penalizes businesses of a certain size if they do not provide coverage to workers. His state has highest percentage of insured in nation. On Medicaid, proposes to convert program to a federal block grant administered by states

Santorum: Would seek to starve Obama's health care law of money needed to implement it. Supported Bush administration's prescription drug program for the elderly.

IMMIGRATION:

Bachmann: Favors fence all along the 1,900-mile U.S.-Mexico border, not just the 650 miles built at a cost of $2.6 billion. Opposes government benefits for illegal immigrants and their children.

Gingrich: In contrast to most rivals, supports giving legal status to illegal immigrants who have sunk roots in the U.S. and lived otherwise lawfully. "If you've been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids, you've been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local church, I don't think we're going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully and kick you out." Supports path to citizenship for illegal immigrants' children who perform U.S. military service. Make English the official language. Divert more Homeland Security assets to fighting illegal immigration at Mexican border.

Huntsman: Unrealistic to deport all illegal immigrants. Says a fence is probably a necessary step to securing the border even though "the thought of a fence to some extent repulses me, because it is not consistent with the image that we projected to the rest of the world." In Utah, threatened to veto a bill to repeal cheaper in-state college tuition rates for children of illegal immigrants.

Paul: Do "whatever it takes" to secure the border, end the right to citizenship of U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, no social services for illegal immigrants, aggressive deportation of those who overstay a visa or otherwise break U.S. law.

Perry: Opposes complete U.S.-Mexico border fence, which he calls "idiocy," instead wants more border agents. Supports continued U.S. citizenship for U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants can get in-state tuition at Texas universities if they meet other residency requirements. Neither employers nor state agencies required to run job applicants through a federal database to determine their legal status. Illegal immigrants have access to services for drug treatment, mental health and children with special health care needs.

Romney: Favors complete U.S.-Mexico border fence, opposes education benefits to illegal immigrants. Proposes more visas for holders of advanced degrees in math, science and engineering who have U.S. job offers, and would award permanent residency to foreign students who graduate from U.S. schools with a degree in those fields.

Santorum: Supports complete border fence, opposes letting children of illegal immigrants qualify for cheaper in-state tuition and says federal government should not require states to offer any social services to illegal immigrants. Favors making English the official language.

SOCIAL SECURITY:

Bachmann: Keep Social Security for older workers and "wean everybody else off." Says it is "very likely" that the age for retirement benefits will have to go up for new workers.

Gingrich: Give younger workers the option of diverting Social Security taxes to private retirement accounts.

Huntsman: Open to raising the retirement age to qualify for full benefits and to restricting benefits for the wealthy.

Paul: Says younger workers should be able to opt out of Social Security taxes and retirement benefits.

Perry: Proposes raising retirement age for full benefits and restricting increases in benefits for the wealthy. Previously branded Social Security a "disease" inflicted by Franklin Roosevelt, now says system should be saved for future generations while younger workers are given the option of building private accounts instead of paying taxes into the entitlement.

Romney: Says raising the age for benefits and reducing inflation adjustments for rich retirees are among options that should be considered.

Santorum: Supports option of private retirement accounts instead of Social Security taxes and benefits for younger workers.

TAXES:

Bachmann: Eliminate estate tax. Tax holiday followed by low tax rate, 5 percent, for U.S. companies operating overseas that repatriate their profits. Voted against a temporary cut in payroll tax pushed by Obama.

Gingrich: Cut corporate tax to 12.5 percent from maximum 35 percent, eliminate capital gains and estate taxes, let companies write off all new equipment in one year. For personal taxes, let people choose whether to file under the current system or pay a 15 percent tax, preserving the mortgage interest and charitable deductions. Supported extending payroll tax cut.

Huntsman: Favors lower income tax rates coupled with the elimination of deductions and loopholes. Cut corporate tax to 25 percent from a maximum 35 percent, and phase out all subsidies.

Paul: Eliminate the federal income tax and the IRS. Meantime would vote for a national sales tax, supports certain excise taxes and certain tariffs. Favors massive spending cuts to defund close to half the government and eliminate the need to replace the income tax at all. Supported payroll tax cut.

Perry: Let taxpayers choose between current system and 20 percent flat tax on income. Under the flat-tax option, mortgage interest and charitable contributions would continue to be deductible. For each individual or dependent, $12,500 in income would be exempt. Flat-tax plan would eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, inheritances, dividends and long-term capital gains. Also proposes to cut corporate tax rate to 20 percent from 35 percent.

Romney: No one with adjusted gross income under $200,000 should be taxed on interest, dividends or capital gains. Cut corporate tax rate to 25 percent from a high of 35 percent. Opposes proposals to replace current tax system with national sales tax because he says it raises taxes on middle class while lowering them for rich and poor. Make Bush-era tax cuts, including for the wealthy, permanent. Eliminate estate tax. Dodged on extending cut in payroll tax, saying he doesn't like "temporary little Band-Aids" but also he's not for raising taxes "anywhere."

Santorum: Proposes zero corporate tax. "If you manufacture in America, you aren't going to pay any taxes." Opposes any national sales tax.

TERRORISM:

Bachmann: Expand Guantanamo, no Miranda or constitutional rights for foreign terrorist suspects. "I would be willing to use waterboarding," now banned, in interrogations.

Gingrich: Supports extending and strengthening investigative powers of Patriot Act. Supports continued use of Guantanamo Bay detention for suspected terrorists. Supported creation of Homeland Security apparatus, because "we need some capacity to respond to massive events." In 2009, said of waterboarding: "It's not something we should do."

Huntsman: Said Homeland Security Department has been heavy-handed, conveying a "fortress security mentality that is not American." Says on interrogations: "We should not torture. Waterboarding is torture."

Paul: Opposes the surveillance and search powers of the Patriot Act. Says terrorists would not be motivated to attack America if the U.S. ended its military presence abroad. "The Patriot Act is unpatriotic because it undermines our liberty." Says: "Waterboarding is torture. And it's illegal under international law and under our law. It's also immoral. And it's also very impractical. There's no evidence that you really get reliable evidence."

Perry: Said it was "unprincipled" for Republicans to vote for creation of the Homeland Security Department. Supports continued use of Guantanamo Bay detention for suspected terrorists and extension of Patriot Act. Would seek to privatize Transportation Security Administration and decertify its unions. Said U.S. interrogators should "use any technique that they can" short of torture, which he did not define.

Romney: No constitutional rights for foreign terrorism suspects. In 2007, refused to rule out use of waterboarding to interrogate terrorist suspects. In 2011, his campaign says he does not consider waterboarding to be torture.

Santorum: Defends creation of Homeland Security Department as an attempt to fix a "complete mess" in the domestic security apparatus. Voted to reauthorize Patriot Act. Says airport screeners should employ profiling; "Muslims would be someone you'd look at, absolutely." Supports continued use of Guantanamo Bay detention for suspected terrorists. Says waterboarding has proved effective.

WAR:

Bachmann: "Defense spending did not cause our budget crisis and we must maintain our military strength." Opposed U.S. intervention in Libya, saying the effort might be helping terrorists there. Called Afghanistan a war "we must and can win" provided generals have sufficient troops and money.

Gingrich: Initially criticized Obama for not intervening in Libya, then did an about-face after the president had sent in U.S. war planes to support the rebels fighting the government. "I would not have used American and European forces." No cuts in defense spending except waste. Supported Iraq war and opposed early timetables for withdrawal. Praised Obama's decision to bolster troops in Afghanistan two years ago; noncommittal this year on when and how they should withdraw, but opposes "precipitous" pullout.

Huntsman: Proposes scaling back U.S. involvement in international conflicts and, in contrast with most rivals, says Pentagon budget should be cut. Opposes U.S. military assistance of new Libyan government. Opposed U.S. military intervention in Libya absent congressional approval. Says no more than 15,000 U.S. troops should be left in Afghanistan. Says to end nation building abroad "when this nation needs to be built."

Paul: Bring all or nearly all troops home, from Afghanistan and other foreign posts, "as quick as the ships could get there." Opposed U.S. intervention in Libya. "We've been fighting wars since World War II, technically in an unconstitutional fashion." Cut Pentagon budget.

Perry: Criticized Obama for announcing withdrawal of troops from Iraq by end of this year and from Afghanistan next year but has not said how many troops should remain or for how long.

Romney: Has not specified the troop numbers behind his pledge to ensure the "force level necessary to secure our gains and complete our mission successfully" in Afghanistan. "This is not time for America to cut and run." Said Obama was wrong to begin reducing troop levels as soon as he did. Would increase strength of armed forces, including number of troops and warships.

Santorum: Said in September 2011 that 20,000 to 30,000 U.S. troops should remain in Iraq. Says U.S. troops should withdraw from Afghanistan "a little slower" than Obama is planning. "When we engage in Iraq and Afghanistan, we engage because we want to be successful. We want victory." In May, accused Obama of creating a "morass" because he let the international community take the lead in Libya. Opposes closure of U.S. bases abroad. "We have to have the ability to confront those threats from around the world, which means we need basing around the world."

Associated Press writers Brian Bakst and Chris Tomlinson contributed to this report.

We encourage your feedback and dialog.
Please be civil and respectful.
If you're witty, to the point and quotable, your reader comments may also be included on the Around the Towns page of The Sunday Republican.
Registered users comments will be posted automatically.
All other comments will be reviewed by our staff before appearing on the Web site. Click Here to register.

  • Paul gets front-runner's welcome in Iowa
  • Fearing split, pastors urge GOP candidates to drop out
  • In latest poll, Romney leads, but Santorum surges
  • WHERE THEY STAND: The 7 GOP candidates on 13 issues
  • Golf, hikes and sea turtles fill Obama's Hawaii vacation time
  • In Iowa, Obama toils while GOP roars then departs
  • Romney leads, Santorum surges in new Iowa poll
  • Poll: Latinos back Obama over Romney despite deportation policy
  • Gary Johnson quits GOP race, will run as Libertarian
  • Scars remain from Gingrich's ethics case
  • In swing Ohio, Gingrich gaining the 'not-Romneys'
  • GOP campaign for Iowa caucus enters final week
  • Outside groups air barrage of ads in Massachusetts race
  • Presidential hopefuls focus on Iowa
  • Occupy hecklers drown out Bachmann at Iowa diner
  • Paul's campaign draws a crowd
  • Gov. introduced as 'future US president' in Chile
  • Romney ignores Gingrich's taunts on ads, tax spat
  • Gary Johnson to drop GOP bid for Libertarian run
  • As Romney criticizes Obama, Gingrich alleges smear
  • Gingrich, Romney disavow super PACs that backers are using on their behalf
  • Republicans outpace Democrats in party fundraising
  • Iowa Christian group divided, chief backs Santorum
  • For her, Obama's quest is personal
  • Negative ads mix with holiday cheer in Iowa
  • Paul emerges as outsider alternative in GOP race
  • Did Gingrich bend campaign laws with his 'independent' committee?
  • Lesser-known candidates share spotlight in NH
  • As Romney's firm profited in SC, jobs disappeared
  • ESPN analyst making run for Senate

Source: http://www.rep-am.com/news/elections/doc4ee777889e0b5879228670.txt

fred davis fred davis fracking fracking drosselmeyer drosselmeyer pacific standard time

Thursday, 29 December 2011

Phillip Kayser, Ron Paul Endorser, Called For Executing Homosexuals Under 'Biblical Law'

Ron Paul's campaign is touting the endorsement of Phillip G. Kayser, an Iowa pastor who believes in imposing the death penalty on homosexuals, reports Talking Points Memo.

"We welcome Rev. Kayser's endorsement and the enlightening statements he makes on how Ron Paul's approach to government is consistent with Christian beliefs," said Paul's Iowa chairman, Drew Ivers, in a recent press release on Paul's campaign website.

"Difficulty in implementing Biblical law does not make non-Biblical penology just," wrote Kayser in a recent pamphlet. "But as we have seen, while many homosexuals would be executed, the threat of capital punishment can be restorative." Kayser added that homosexuals could be prosecuted only after the law was enacted.

TPM adds that Paul's Iowa state director, Mike Heath, led the Christian Civic League of Maine. In that position, he called on his supporters in 2004 to email him with information on the sexual orientation of the state's political leaders.

Paul has had one of the more pro-gay rights records among Republicans in Congress. He voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment and for the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy barring gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. However, he still supports the Defense of Marriage Act, which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages and allows states not to recognize other states' same-sex marriages. "Like the majority of Iowans, I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman and must be protected," he said in February.

Eric Dondero, a former senior aide to Paul, recently explained Paul's stance on gay rights in light of racist and homophobic newsletters written under his name in the 1980s and 90s that have resurfaced. "He is not all bigoted towards homosexuals. He supports their rights to do whatever they please in their private lives," he wrote. "He is however, personally uncomfortable around homosexuals, no different from a lot of older folks of his era."

Gay rights activist and author Dan Savage recently defended Paul. "And Ron may not like gay people, and may not want to hang out with us or use our toilets, but he's content to leave us the f*** alone and recognizes that gay citizens are entitled to the same rights as all other citizens," he said in Slate. "[Rick] Santorum, on the other hand, believes that his bigotry must be given the force of law. That's an important difference."

Also on HuffPost:

'; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/28/phillip-kayser-ron-paul-gays-iowa-caucus-2012_n_1173338.html

gabby giffords gabby giffords hunger games trailer hunger games trailer gabrielle giffords austin rivers austin rivers

Stealth Tech, Facebook Revolutions, Shadow Wars: The Most Dangerous Year Ever

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Source: www.wired.com --- Tuesday, December 27, 2011
When 2011 began, Osama bin Laden was still alive, U.S. troops were still fighting in Iraq, and Iran could only dream about capturing our most advanced spy drone. By the end of the year, everything had flipped upside-down. ...

Source: http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/~3/EPB50imdanw/

sweet potato recipes green bean casserole recipe karina smirnoff pumpkin cheesecake deviled eggs pie crust pie crust

HBT: Ex-Red Sox reliever Okajima going to Yanks

Hideki Okajima spent nearly all of last season in the minors despite being paid $1.75 million by the Red Sox and now the veteran reliever will try to make it back to the majors with the Yankees.

David Waldstein of the New York Times reports that Okajima has agreed to a minor-league contract with the Yankees that includes an invitation to spring training.

At age 36 the odds are against Okajima reestablishing himself as a quality setup man, but he pitched very well at Triple-A with a 2.29 ERA and 48/9 K/BB ratio in 51 innings and if nothing else could be useful as a situational left-hander.

Okajima provided an excellent return on the Red Sox?s investment after signing out of Japan in 2006, throwing 246 innings with a 3.11 ERA while being paid around $8.5 million.

Source: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/28/yankees-sign-hideki-okajima-to-minor-league-deal/related/

trisomy 13 veterans barbados resorts the call helen mirren surrogates surrogates

Wednesday, 28 December 2011

PSA: Verizon experiencing nation-wide data outage?

That phone on Big Red having problems with data? Apparently you're not alone, as the carrier appears to be having issues again judging by the metric ton of emails we've gotten from you experiencing LTE, and in some cases CDMA, blackouts across the country. Our Galaxy Nexus in New York is chugging along with 1xRTT while a Thunderbolt in Washington DC is doing just fine with CDMA. We've just pinged Verizon and will update if we hear back.

[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]

PSA: Verizon experiencing nation-wide data outage? originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/28/psa-verizons-data-outage-across-the-us/

ama awards 2011 ama awards 2011 uekman uekman music awards music awards giants eagles

Immunomedics, UCB tweak pact on cancer, lupus drug

TEL AVIV (MarketWatch) -- Immunomedics Inc., /quotes/zigman/73672/quotes/nls/immu IMMU -0.59% the Morris Plains, N.J., biopharma firm, and UCB SA, /quotes/zigman/246476 UCBJF +1.06% /quotes/zigman/246465 BE:UCB +0.98% the Brussels biopharma firm, adjusted their accord under which they will develop and market epratuzumab for lupus, cancer and other diseases. Under the new terms, Immunomedics gets the rights to market the drug against cancer; previously, UCB had had the right to buy into the marketing of the drug against cancer. In addition, UCB gets the right to sublicense the drug for marketing against lupus and other diseases in certain territories and to select its partners in that effort. The financials: Immunomedics gets $30 million up front; another $30 million if UCB exercises the sublicensing option; and additional payments if the drug reaches certain regulatory and sales goals; and UCB gets a five-year warrant to buy one million Immunomedics shares at $8 each. The drug is currently undergoing testing in two Phase III studies in patients with moderate to severe lupus.

/quotes/zigman/73672/quotes/nls/immu

Volume: 388,813

Dec. 27, 2011 4:00p

/quotes/zigman/246476

Volume: 494.00

Dec. 21, 2011 2:13p

/quotes/zigman/246465

Volume: 6,325

Dec. 28, 2011 9:30a

Source: http://c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r5670728554

pau gasol virginia tech va tech duggar miscarriage dan gilbert david stern david stern

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

Literate Partner - Fantasy Romance-ish Roleplay!

Hi, everyone!

I don't normally do this but I'm going to propose something completely different to my usual preferences. A romance fantasy roleplay! Well, at least somewhat romance-ish; consider it as a subplot. Basically, the idea is very fragile and undefined at the moment because it formed suddenly.

I wish to play a female tiefling who would meet your character in one way or another and after that follow him for one reason or another - either out of necessity, curiosity or something else. If you're unfamiliar with tieflings, they are basically humans with some form of fiendish ancestry in their blood and are thus somewhat deformed, with horns, pointed teeth, a tail and so on. I know what you're thinking here again. Oh, no, demons again! Please, bear with me. Tieflings aren't demons, they simply have traits that make them society outcasts for the most part. If you're interested in reading more, feel free to follow this link. There aren't a lot of them about at all and are, because of their dubious ancestry, regarded as second-class citizens, distrusted, shunned and sometimes even taken advantage of or assaulted by vigilantes who think they're doing the right thing.

However, whether you are familiar with the D&D setting or not is irrelevant. Because I am a thieving little bugger, I'm willing to snatch the tiefling race and put it into an original fantasy world created by both of us. I'm leaning more towards a medieval fantasy world than not but we can work things out as we go.

What the actual plot will be, I'm not sure as of yet, but I would definitely wish a romance subplot to develop (can hardly believe I'm asking this!). However this romance develops, I would just like to add that I can't stand instant or artificial romances. It has to come naturally to the characters, although, of course, this sentence sort of negates the previous one. Argh! *head explodes*

A few more final thoughts.
- You will have to be literate and post healthy posts. I won't require lengths that I use for more serious plots but anything around 500+ words would do nicely.
- Be nice and use an instant messaging program.
- Play a male character. Sorry, only a straight romance will do.
- Be dedicated. Even though I might have made this thread sound like I'm only doing this as something to occupy my mind until something better pops in, I'm a dedicated player and won't leave just because I grew bored. If both of us pool our resources into the world and plot, it could become something a lot of fun.

*gulps, presses the submit button*

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/6CW8Wht8yx0/viewtopic.php

remember the titans wale wale weather denver weather denver ambition dorothy rodham

iPod touch vs. Galaxy Player 5.0 ? Part 1: Screen, Hardware, and Aesthetics

Up to this point, there has not really been a direct competitor to the iPod touch. Since its original release in 2007, it has continued to dominate the portable music market with millions sold worldwide. Despite Jobs saying that the it was training wheels for the iPhone, the iPod touch has really grown into its own. Recently it has stepped out of the shadow of the iPhone and moved beyond the iPod line. Users can listen to music, watch movies, and play their favorite games anywhere. Not many other devices do this. Most tech companies have basically decided that this is lost territory. While companies like Motorola, and Amazon have focused their efforts on the tablet market, combating the iPad, Apple has roped of this section of the market. No one dares to cross the line? that is until Samsung decided to make a device of their own.

Recently they released their own portable media player, the Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0. This is the first device that could potentially rival the iPod touch. So, of course I got my hands on one and for the past couple weeks, put it through its paces. Keep in mind that I am an avid iPod user but I am going to try and be as unbiased as possible.

Screen:

The first noticeable thing on either of these devices is the screen. This is one of the primary factors when picking out a phone, and it is not any different with music playing devices. The iPod touch of course sports a 3.5 inch Retina Display that just looks absolutely amazing. It is always crisp and has an incredible viewing angle?from the sides it?s near 180? and the top and bottom are about 170?. The pixels are so small that the eyes cannot distinguish one from another.

The Galaxy Player?s WVGA screen is really not as nice. Edges on text are not nearly as smooth and sharp and the viewing angle is slightly worse. However, the Samsung has much more screen real estate. In fact at 5 inches, the entire iPod touch can nearly fit on the Player?s screen alone. This makes watching YouTube more enjoyable and the web experience is closer to that of a desktop. Because of the large screen on the Galaxy Player though, things seem just a little blown out of proportion.? I think there is a reason that phones do not go this big, because 5 inches feels like a small tablet. Beyond screen size, Samsung?s device is less responsive and accurate. When typing, my fingers, although the screen is so much bigger, never seem to hit the right keys. (More on this later).

Overall I?m going to have to say that the iPod wins this round. Its retina display is brighter, sharper, and more accurate. You might be thinking that bigger is always better, but even though it only has a 3.5 inch screen, it feels more comfortable in the hand and provides for a better user experience.

iPod touch: 1/Galaxy Player: 0

External Hardware:

Hardware is the next thing I look for in a good product. The number of buttons, where they are located, and how esthetically pleasing the device is, are all key factors. To begin with, the iPod touch is has some great hardware. Apple keeps buttons to a minimum and gave it a sleek metal back. The 30pin connector and headset jack are located on the bottom while the top has the power/lock button. The volume controls are located on the side. The front of the device has only the screen, camera, and the home button. The iPod touch is definitely for those who prefer a minimalistic look.

The Galaxy Player 5.0 has quite a different build. The back is all plastic and it has two speaker grills. At the top of the device is where you will find a MicroSD card slot. On the right side, you get a power button and a volume rocker and located on the bottom there is the headset jack, microphone, and microUSB port. The front of the device has the screen, front facing camera, and 3 capacitive buttons?menu, home, and back. There is also some sort of earphone grill, but I can?t figure out what it is for, because it is not a phone? The Galaxy Player?s, face reminds me a lot of previous versions of the iPhone, as it sports a silver bevel.

I actually prefer the Player?s 3 buttons as opposed to the iPod?s one. Having a dedicated back key took a bit to get used to, but it is surprisingly convenient. I like how the buttons are not physical keys either, because it makes the front so sleek looking. The only problem is that they are only on, when the device is unlocked, so unlike the iPod touch, you can only wake the device with the power button. This isn?t a huge deal, but out of habit I try to press the home button to wake it. The microSD slot was not a bad idea either; because the Galaxy Player only has 8GB of storage, having the ability to expand to is really great. I also prefer the plastic back opposed to the iPod?s metal one. Yea it?s plastic, but the iPod?s back is a scratch magnet (and probably the worst decision Apple designers have ever made). I am able to set it down without worrying about getting about a million scratches. ?The Samsung also has two speaker grills on the back. Because the touch?s speaker is internal, it is not as loud and clear.

Due to the dedicated back button, the better speakers, and the harder-to-scratch back, the external hardware winner is, in my opinion, clearly the Samsung Galaxy Player.

iPod touch:1/Galaxy Player:1

Overall?Aesthetics:

Neither of these devices look bad. They each have something going on for them in terms of form and style. I am putting all function aside and just judging on pure looks. Shallow? Yes, but I think appearance does matter.

The iPod Touch is a thing of beauty. With its slim form factor and its sleek steel back it represents everything that is Apple. It is so pleasing to look at with its all black front and?iconic single?button. The Apple logo on the back completes the package. The iPod is one of the best looking devices on the market.

This being said, the Samsung Galaxy Player 5.o is no ugly ducking. It is not as thin as or small as the iPod, but surprisingly, there is not that big of a weight difference?81 grams. The Galaxy player does have a silver bevel around the edge, which in my opinion, it could do without. It also has the silver Samsung logo on the front which takes away from the sleek black. The back edges are rounded though, making it comfortable in the hands.

I am going to have to give this one to the iPod Touch. I just don?t think there are many devices out there that can beat an Apple device. They are so pure and simple and I could stare at it for hours.

iPod touch: 2/Galaxy Player: 1

Internal Hardware:

Everyone always says it is what?s on the inside that counts. Of course I am talking about the processor, the battery, and the other bits and pieces that go into these two devices, but the saying holds true. ?How long can I get on a single charge of the battery? How fast is the processor? Things like this are always important to me.

The iPod Touch has Apple?s 1GHz A4 processor (underclocked to 800MHz) and 256MB of RAM. While it is not the fastest processor on the market, applications load quick enough and Apple?s version of multitasking is made possible. As far as the battery goes, the iPod has a lithium-ion battery that Apple says lasts anywhere from about?7 hours (continuous video playback) to?40 hours (music playback). The Touch also has a gyroscope and accelerometer which are primarily used in gaming. Lastly, it has flash storage ranging from 8-64Gigs.

Samsung?s device has the 1GHz hummingbird processor and double the RAM at 512MB. Things load fairly quickly, but it is not a landslide over the iPod. Some applications?like Angry Birds?load faster on the iPod where others?like Facebook and Dolphin Web Browser?are quicker on the Galaxy Player. The GP has a Li-Polymer battery that Samsung claims gets 8 hours of video playback and 60 hours of music. In my personal experience, the battery lasts about as long as I do in a day. I charge it every night before I go to bed, and it lasts late into the night the next day. It also does seem to have a longer standby time than that of the iPod Touch. The Galaxy Player only has 8Gigs of internal storage, but with the SD card slot, it is expandable up to 40. Like Apple?s device, Samsung also put in an accelerometer and gyroscope; however, they also added a compass and GPS. The GPS is a really great feature for traveling. I can load the Google maps, and it will give me turn by turn directions. This is something that the iPod is lacking and definitely needs.

I think I am going to call this one a draw. The Galaxy Player has a faster processor on paper, but in my actual tests, it was not that big of a difference. And while it also has a GPS, this is not a make-or-break feature. Both batteries last as long as I need them to and although the Player?s battery lasts longer, the iPod does charge a bit faster. It can charge to 80% in about 2 hours whereas the Galaxy Player takes FOR-EV-ER.

iPod touch: 3/Player Touch :2

As you can see, these to multimedia players are fairly equal. One maybe have a better quality display, while the other may be bigger. The iPod Touch charges faster, but doesn?t last as long as the Galaxy Player. Samsung?s device has a faster processor and more RAM but Apple uses some sort of magic to make the Touch just as fast.

Final score for part one: iPod touch: 3/Galaxy Player: 2

Stay tuned for part two, where I will take a look at the cameras, media playback, and software. If there is anything specific you want me to look at, leave a comment below or send me a tweet @TiP_Bryce.

Source: http://www.todaysiphone.com/2011/12/ipod-touchs-first-real-compeditor-%E2%80%93-part-1-screen-hardware-and-aesthetics/

pacquiao marquez pacquiao marquez penn state game radiohead tour cbsnews ufc on fox fight card florida marlins

Monday, 26 December 2011

California man gets 6 years for gas station shooting

December 24, 2011

Sanne Specht

A Stockton, Calif., man was sentenced to nearly six years in prison Friday for accidently shooting a man at an Ashland gas station in August.

Michael Steven Goldsberry, 29, pleaded no contest in Jackson County Circuit Court to assault, unlawful use of a weapon and two counts of recklessly endangering others.

Judge Tim Gerking sentenced Goldsberry to five years and 10 months in prison and ordered him to pay restitution of $28,502 for the Aug. 17 shooting.

Goldsberry and his wife of one month, Erica Monique Salas Goldsberry, 22, had argued while driving on Interstate 5, said Chief Deputy District Attorney Beth Heckert.

They pulled off the interstate and into a Shell station so she could call her mother from a pay phone there. After more harsh words, the couple were walking toward their parked vehicle near Eagle Mill Road when for unknown reasons Goldsberry fired a handgun several times into the air.

A bullet struck Douglas George Shelton, 48, of Ashland, in the shoulder. Shelton was taken to Rogue Valley Medical Center, and two other people in the area were also placed in danger by Goldsberry's reckless behavior, said Heckert.

"He fired a couple shots and hit (Shelton)," Heckert said, adding bullet holes were found in an adjacent U-Haul trailer.

After the shots were fired, the couple left, prompting a search involving officers, police dogs and a helicopter.

A tow-truck driver spotted Goldsberry's disabled truck on I-5, and police moved in to arrest both of the Goldsberrys.

Six weapons were seized from Goldsberry's vehicle, said Heckert, who asked for and received forfeiture of the guns as part of Friday's sentence.

Erica Goldsberry in September pleaded guilty to first-degree theft. A trailer being towed by the couple was determined to have been stolen, Heckert said, adding the new bride was sentenced to 30 days in jail and two years supervised probation.

Goldsberry's public defender, Don Scales, said his client was pleading no contest to the Measure 11 second-degree assault charge, in addition to two counts of recklessly endangering another and a single count of unlawful use of a weapon.

Scales said his client admitted to reckless behavior. He'd fired off his handgun irresponsibly, injured a man, and would have considerable time to reflect upon his actions in prison.

"This is, once again, a good lesson to be safe with guns and not be firing them willy-nilly," Scales said.

Gerking sentenced Goldsberry to more than five years for the assault, a year on each endangering charge and 14 months on the weapons charge. All sentences will be served concurrently.

Reach Sanne Specht at 541-776-4497 or email sspecht@mailtribune.com.


Reader Reaction We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Rules. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment. New comments are only accepted for two weeks from the date of publication. All comments are subject to moderation.

Source: http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111224/NEWS/112240313/-1/rss31

hanley ramirez blago mumia abu jamal mumia abu jamal pearl harbor alec baldwin alec baldwin

Church Aids Families Of Unemployed


???All Albuquerque Journal news products require a paid subscription
  • Why we charge
    ??? ABQJournal.com is free to Albuquerque Journal print newspaper 7-day subscribers. If you are a daily print subscriber, register here for free access to ABQJournal.com
    ???Customer Service or call 505-823-4400
    USE PAYPAL
    99 cents
    for access to today's ABQjournal and eJournal
  • ?
    Find username or password
    Remember Me for a Month

    Source: http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2011/12/24/riorancho/church-aids-families-of-unemployed.html

    asu football arkansas lsu storage wars storage wars millionaire matchmaker millionaire matchmaker shawshank redemption

    Sunday, 25 December 2011

    Politics ? N Korea to loom large in Japan-China summit

    [unable to retrieve full-text content]

    Source: www.japantoday.com --- Friday, December 23, 2011
    Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda heads to Beijing on Sunday as the first foreign leader to meet the Chinese leadership after the death of North Korean strongman Kim Jong-Il. President Hu Jintao could use the occasion to assure the international community that Beijing was working to ensure a stable transition of? ...

    Source: http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/n-korea-to-loom-large-in-japan-china-summit

    election day 2011 mississippi personhood herman cain press conference joe frazier dead joe frazier dead topamax

    TerraMexico: #Balacera deja dos muertos en centro comercial de #Chalco http://t.co/GV0X6Yz9

    • Passer la navigation
    • Twitter sur votre mobile ? Cliquez ici m.twitter.com!
    • Passer cette ?tape
    • Connexion
    Loader Twitter.com
    • Connexion
    #Balacera deja dos muertos en centro comercial de #Chalco bit.ly/tNkhwf TerraMexico

    Terra M?xico

    Pied de page

    Source: http://twitter.com/TerraMexico/statuses/150381029763448832

    cornucopia best buy black friday deals thanksgiving crafts matt cassel snowman google music willis mcgahee

    Saturday, 24 December 2011

    Army: Some Arlington markers may need replacement

    (AP) ? Thousands of grave markers at Arlington National Cemetery may need to be replaced or added to accurately account for the dead, following a meticulous Army review of each of the nearly 260,000 headstones and niche covers on the grounds.

    In a report to Congress on Thursday, the Army found potential discrepancies between headstones and cemetery paperwork on about 64,000 grave markers ? about one in four.

    Congress ordered the review last year following reports of misidentified and misplaced graves that led to the ouster of the cemetery's top executives.

    The report found no further evidence of misplaced graves, though it cautioned that its review is not complete and that some errors could have gone undetected.

    There are potentially thousands of minor errors, including misspelled names, or incorrect military ranks and dates of birth and death.

    The Army compared information on every headstone to its internal records, scouring handwritten logs of the dead from the Civil War and a hodgepodge of other records to verify accuracy.

    In an interview, the cemetery's executive director, Kathryn Condon, said reviews are ongoing and it's premature to try to estimate exactly how many headstones may need replacement.

    To be sure, many of the 64,000 discrepancies will turn up no problem with a headstone ? it may be as simple as a typo on an internal record. And in many cases, the discrepancies are not errors at all but reflect past practices at the cemetery that are now considered outdated.

    One of the biggest surprises uncovered by the review was that in most of the early 20th century, the cemetery did not include the name of a wife on a headstone when she was buried next to her husband. Under current practices, the name of the spouse is etched onto the back of the headstone.

    Condon said the cemetery will correct that by adding the spouse's name to the gravesite. She said it is not only the right thing to do but is also required by law.

    Accounting for the forgotten spouses alone will require thousands of corrections, officials said. In some cases, replacement headstones will be made. In cases where the headstones are considered historic, footstones will be added.

    Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who was critical of the old management team and has been supportive of Condon's reform efforts, said the cemetery "is now a turnaround story. After we uncovered chronic managerial failure and demanded comprehensive reforms from a new leadership team, I am pleased to receive this report that shows great progress and lays out a plan to finish the job."

    But Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., said the report "raises more questions than it answers," particularly with the ultimate disposition of those 64,000 discrepancies. He said that while Condon has worked hard to improve management at the cemetery, he is not convinced that the cemetery has fixed its data-management problems. Warner had asked a consortium of northern Virginia technology companies to help the cemetery get a data-management plan in place, and he wants further assurances that the Army took the help that was offered on a pro bono basis.

    The Army and a team of 70 analysts are undertaking painstaking reviews of every case where they find a potential discrepancy to ensure that records are made accurate. Those reviews are expected to be completed in the summer.

    The process began with a hand count, using simple mechanical clickers, of every gravesite ? 259,978 to be exact. (More than 300,000 people are buried at Arlington, but some grave markers have two or more names.) Then, during the summer, members of the Army's ceremonial Old Guard unit used iPhones to photograph the front and back of every headstone, so the information could be compared against internal records.

    Officials cited Christian Keiner, a Civil War veteran from New York who died in 1919, as a typical example. The headstone reflected only his name, but internal records showed that his wife, Caroline Keiner, had also been buried there in 1915. In addition, the internal records spelled Caroline Keiner's name as "Kiner." Officials reviewed handwritten Census records from 1900 and Civil war-era military and pension records to confirm that "Keiner" was indeed the correct spelling.

    The Keiners' great-granddaughter, 52-year-old Cee Cee Molineaux of Annapolis, Md., was shocked to learn the story of her ancestors Thursday when reached by phone by The Associated Press. She had only passing knowledge of her great-grandparents, and no idea her great-grandfather served in the Civil War. She was gratified that the cemetery is making efforts to commemorate the resting place of her great-grandmother.

    "It's absolutely meaningful to me ? not just because she's an ancestor but just for women in general. To not have their final resting place acknowledged is kind of sad," said Molineaux, who now works for the American Red Cross.

    John Schrader, co-chair of the Gravesite Accountability Task Force, said recordkeeping methods varied widely over the cemetery's 147-year history, from handwritten logs to index cards, to typewritten forms and two different computer databases. That sometimes compounded problems, as transcription errors were common. To avoid those problems, all of the old records have been scanned and digitized, rather than transcribed, to avoid introducing further errors, he said.

    The sheer size of the cemetery also made the task difficult. It is the second-largest cemetery in the country as well as a tourist site that draws more than 4 million visitors a year, all while conducting nearly 30 burials a day, some with full military honors.

    The most significant part of the review, Condon said, is that the cemetery for the first time has a single, reliable database that will allow officials to fix past mistakes and plan for the future.

    The cemetery is currently testing an interactive, web-based version of its database that will allow visitors to click on a digital map to see gravesites and learn who is buried there, ensuring the cemetery's records are open and accessible going forward.

    "We'll have 300 million American fact-checkers," Schrader said.

    ___

    Researcher Judith Ausuebel contributed to this report from New York.

    Associated Press

    Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2011-12-22-Arlington%20Cemetery/id-6f6360af9baf49629f37b3b9c70f2029

    sean hayes caroline manzo caroline manzo the haunting in connecticut ashram ashram merce cunningham